<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schreiner on Judgment According to Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/</link>
	<description>pursuing faithfulness to the Word of God and fullness of the Spirit of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/comment-page-1/#comment-11654</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/#comment-11654</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

I enjoyed the post greatly (and your blog as a whole). I started responding back in a comment, but it was getting too long, so I decided to respond in a post on my blog... (sorry I don&#039;t know how to link on your blog, I&#039;m slightly technically illiterate).

http://zetountes.blogspot.com/2010/01/imputation-and-judgment-on-basis-of.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>I enjoyed the post greatly (and your blog as a whole). I started responding back in a comment, but it was getting too long, so I decided to respond in a post on my blog&#8230; (sorry I don&#8217;t know how to link on your blog, I&#8217;m slightly technically illiterate).</p>
<p><a href="http://zetountes.blogspot.com/2010/01/imputation-and-judgment-on-basis-of.html" rel="nofollow">http://zetountes.blogspot.com/2010/01/imputation-and-judgment-on-basis-of.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/comment-page-1/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just discovered your blog and am making my way through some of what you&#039;ve written; I&#039;m really enjoying  it.  If only I had all the time in the world.

I haven&#039;t read either of these guys on this in while.  Schreiner definitely rejects Wright&#039;s understanding of &quot;righteousness of God&quot; (or at least thinks Wright is too narrow, it&#039;s all a little hazy).  But as far as the place of works, it seems to me the last Schreiner quote you give is essentially what Wright argues for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just discovered your blog and am making my way through some of what you&#8217;ve written; I&#8217;m really enjoying  it.  If only I had all the time in the world.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read either of these guys on this in while.  Schreiner definitely rejects Wright&#8217;s understanding of &#8220;righteousness of God&#8221; (or at least thinks Wright is too narrow, it&#8217;s all a little hazy).  But as far as the place of works, it seems to me the last Schreiner quote you give is essentially what Wright argues for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/comment-page-1/#comment-11650</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/#comment-11650</guid>
		<description>hi Danny, I don&#039;t have Wright&#039;s big Romans commentary, but I do have his For Everyone on Romans 1-8, so I&#039;ll remind myself of exactly what he says. I don&#039;t recall Schreiner interacting with him in the commentary or footnotes on Rom 2. Schreiner has already dismissed Wright&#039;s take on the &quot;righteousness of God&quot; in Rom 1:17 as covenantal faithfulness as being only part of the picture. When I get round to reading Schreiner on Rom 2:25-29 I might do another post.

BTW, I love your blog. I&#039;ve subscribed &amp; looking forward to browsing your archives when I get the chance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Danny, I don&#8217;t have Wright&#8217;s big Romans commentary, but I do have his For Everyone on Romans 1-8, so I&#8217;ll remind myself of exactly what he says. I don&#8217;t recall Schreiner interacting with him in the commentary or footnotes on Rom 2. Schreiner has already dismissed Wright&#8217;s take on the &#8220;righteousness of God&#8221; in Rom 1:17 as covenantal faithfulness as being only part of the picture. When I get round to reading Schreiner on Rom 2:25-29 I might do another post.</p>
<p>BTW, I love your blog. I&#8217;ve subscribed &#038; looking forward to browsing your archives when I get the chance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/comment-page-1/#comment-11647</link>
		<dc:creator>danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2010/01/10/schreiner-on-judgment-according-to-works/#comment-11647</guid>
		<description>Interesting, thanks for posting this.  What would say is the difference between Schreiner&#039;s position and N T Wright&#039;s position, given Wright seems to create major waves with his?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, thanks for posting this.  What would say is the difference between Schreiner&#8217;s position and N T Wright&#8217;s position, given Wright seems to create major waves with his?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

