<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newfrontiers Future Directions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/</link>
	<description>pursuing faithfulness to the Word of God and fullness of the Spirit of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-16335</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-16335</guid>
		<description>hi Thomas, I agree that we have much to learn from people like Bonhoeffer, Wright etc, and it was interesting to hear some of the engagement with Keller, Bell and Wright on the &quot;tracking theological trajectories&quot; training track at the Together on a Mission conference this year. 

Also, I don&#039;t know if you got a chance to hear Stef Liston&#039;s talks, in which he made an impassioned plea to be more ready to receive contributions and let the Spirit take the lead in our meetings and make them a little less prepared and predictable. Again though, I feel that the simple group dynamics of having more than 150 or so people present can present practical difficulties that hinder that approach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Thomas, I agree that we have much to learn from people like Bonhoeffer, Wright etc, and it was interesting to hear some of the engagement with Keller, Bell and Wright on the &#8220;tracking theological trajectories&#8221; training track at the Together on a Mission conference this year. </p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t know if you got a chance to hear Stef Liston&#8217;s talks, in which he made an impassioned plea to be more ready to receive contributions and let the Spirit take the lead in our meetings and make them a little less prepared and predictable. Again though, I feel that the simple group dynamics of having more than 150 or so people present can present practical difficulties that hinder that approach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-16210</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-16210</guid>
		<description>Mark,

I&#039;ve sweated over whether to reply at all but ... 

... the Sunday referred to by Dan was not an exception.  

Although no longer living in Brighton, I occasionally go to these meetings again and I am reasonably confident in asserting that it is very much the norm.  

If large meetings result in the absence of body ministry (do we actually believe that!), then why are we doing it?  If this is the direct result then and when leaders conferences take place why is there quite so much contribution from the front - are they operating on a higher plane of spiritual gifting and flow?  

John Piper wrote a fantastic book a few years ago called &#039;Brothers we are not professionals&#039;, I think within many aspects of New Frontiers of which I am aware (this is obviously limited), we are increasingly &#039;running&#039; churches as though there were professionals (and by inference - amateurs who can simply pitch-up).

I have no answers, but my starting position is that we are a corporate people marked by the presence of God - how else will they know we walk with God?  A people, a body, a house.   I find Bonhoeffer, N.T. Wight, Moltmann, Jim Wallis and others listed within the more frowned-upon &#039;Emerging&#039; sector to be voices to which we must not close our ears on this topic.

I think that interesting years lay ahead - and anticipate that whist we move &#039;forward&#039; in many areas (Bethel Church&#039;s example on the supernatural comes to mind), a rediscovery of many of the values and discoveries which were so formative for Terry also lay ahead - with these may well come  many of the challenges that Terry and my fathers generation faced.  

I trust on such a journey that we will receive love and grace to continue to love to all our brothers - wherever their influences most lay.

In love,

a brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve sweated over whether to reply at all but &#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; the Sunday referred to by Dan was not an exception.  </p>
<p>Although no longer living in Brighton, I occasionally go to these meetings again and I am reasonably confident in asserting that it is very much the norm.  </p>
<p>If large meetings result in the absence of body ministry (do we actually believe that!), then why are we doing it?  If this is the direct result then and when leaders conferences take place why is there quite so much contribution from the front &#8211; are they operating on a higher plane of spiritual gifting and flow?  </p>
<p>John Piper wrote a fantastic book a few years ago called &#8216;Brothers we are not professionals&#8217;, I think within many aspects of New Frontiers of which I am aware (this is obviously limited), we are increasingly &#8216;running&#8217; churches as though there were professionals (and by inference &#8211; amateurs who can simply pitch-up).</p>
<p>I have no answers, but my starting position is that we are a corporate people marked by the presence of God &#8211; how else will they know we walk with God?  A people, a body, a house.   I find Bonhoeffer, N.T. Wight, Moltmann, Jim Wallis and others listed within the more frowned-upon &#8216;Emerging&#8217; sector to be voices to which we must not close our ears on this topic.</p>
<p>I think that interesting years lay ahead &#8211; and anticipate that whist we move &#8216;forward&#8217; in many areas (Bethel Church&#8217;s example on the supernatural comes to mind), a rediscovery of many of the values and discoveries which were so formative for Terry also lay ahead &#8211; with these may well come  many of the challenges that Terry and my fathers generation faced.  </p>
<p>I trust on such a journey that we will receive love and grace to continue to love to all our brothers &#8211; wherever their influences most lay.</p>
<p>In love,</p>
<p>a brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iago</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>Iago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>This post is really helpful, it describes well some of the different approaches to theology. 

In these sort of conversations it&#039;s easy to take the best arguements from our own preferred point of view, and compare it with the worst of an alternative view. 

I hope that the New Frontiers leadership can avoid this, I was part of a New Frontiers church plant for 3 years, and was &quot;moved on&quot; because I wanted to explore a point of view the was different from the local leadership. I wasn&#039;t asking for new theology to be preached, condoned or even mentioned publicly, just a recognition that there are alternative views which should be understood &amp; tested. 

I hope your post is received and engaged with in a spirit of openness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is really helpful, it describes well some of the different approaches to theology. </p>
<p>In these sort of conversations it&#8217;s easy to take the best arguements from our own preferred point of view, and compare it with the worst of an alternative view. </p>
<p>I hope that the New Frontiers leadership can avoid this, I was part of a New Frontiers church plant for 3 years, and was &#8220;moved on&#8221; because I wanted to explore a point of view the was different from the local leadership. I wasn&#8217;t asking for new theology to be preached, condoned or even mentioned publicly, just a recognition that there are alternative views which should be understood &amp; tested. </p>
<p>I hope your post is received and engaged with in a spirit of openness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave bish</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator>dave bish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2638</guid>
		<description>Pre-testing seems a bit incongrous with 1 Cor 14, though so does &quot;letting it go on all day&quot;... i guess everyone has things to work out. If only we all could do stuff the way 1 Cor 12-14 says most of the fear and caution would disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-testing seems a bit incongrous with 1 Cor 14, though so does &#8220;letting it go on all day&#8221;&#8230; i guess everyone has things to work out. If only we all could do stuff the way 1 Cor 12-14 says most of the fear and caution would disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>&quot;Charisreformissional&quot; ..... I Love it!!!  :)

Yes thanks Mark, you are right for that reminder.  I&#039;m still wrestling with the growth = less spontaneous gifts being brought.  It may be what happens but is it right?  Rob Rufus allowed a uncensored prophecy mike at Glory and Grace in Hong Kong (no getting through Nigel Ring and then Dave Holden and then Terry!).

And guess what?  There was no heresy to correct, I think about once he very reluctantly ended the flow of the prophetic because he said &quot;It could go on all day&quot;.  I wonder if sometimes it&#039;s our fear that puts a stopper on the prophetic flow rather than the Spirit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Charisreformissional&#8221; &#8230;.. I Love it!!!  <img src='http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes thanks Mark, you are right for that reminder.  I&#8217;m still wrestling with the growth = less spontaneous gifts being brought.  It may be what happens but is it right?  Rob Rufus allowed a uncensored prophecy mike at Glory and Grace in Hong Kong (no getting through Nigel Ring and then Dave Holden and then Terry!).</p>
<p>And guess what?  There was no heresy to correct, I think about once he very reluctantly ended the flow of the prophetic because he said &#8220;It could go on all day&#8221;.  I wonder if sometimes it&#8217;s our fear that puts a stopper on the prophetic flow rather than the Spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Whittall</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Whittall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Mark and thanks for the mention. I&#039;d certainly like some more of the themes from 4 discussed and engaged with. We&#039;ve switched I think from being mainly influenced by 1 and 3 to no 2. Although possibly the reason we&#039;re actually interested in no2 is because these guys are leading big churches which means we&#039;re actually still interested mostly in no.1!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Mark and thanks for the mention. I&#8217;d certainly like some more of the themes from 4 discussed and engaged with. We&#8217;ve switched I think from being mainly influenced by 1 and 3 to no 2. Although possibly the reason we&#8217;re actually interested in no2 is because these guys are leading big churches which means we&#8217;re actually still interested mostly in no.1!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>Dave - &quot;charisreformissional&quot; - good word!
Dan - don&#039;t judge CCK on one meeting. Terry shows a remarkable openness to learn from a wide range of people. As for less contributions in meetings, I would say this is more symptomatic of the &quot;church growth&quot; influence than anything else - growing beyond the 500 mark changes the dynamics of a meeting. (e.g. the newfrontiers Brighton conference only has contributions from those personally known to the platform party)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave &#8211; &#8220;charisreformissional&#8221; &#8211; good word!<br />
Dan &#8211; don&#8217;t judge CCK on one meeting. Terry shows a remarkable openness to learn from a wide range of people. As for less contributions in meetings, I would say this is more symptomatic of the &#8220;church growth&#8221; influence than anything else &#8211; growing beyond the 500 mark changes the dynamics of a meeting. (e.g. the newfrontiers Brighton conference only has contributions from those personally known to the platform party)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave bish</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2576</link>
		<dc:creator>dave bish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2576</guid>
		<description>Dan, I guess its entirely possible to be charisreformissional, we can have both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I guess its entirely possible to be charisreformissional, we can have both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>Having just come back from attending the morning and evening services at Church of Christ the King where Terry Virgo was preaching (his first on his return from Australia) - I would have to agree Reformissional is the way they seem to be going.

I was quite surprised at the changes in CCK itself since I have last been there.  I think we last went to CCK when Rob Rufus was preaching just before &quot;TOAM 07&quot; and the emphasis was very much on the Presence of the Spirit and manifest signs, wonders and miracles.

I noted today that there were no &quot;contributions&quot; or &quot;spiritual gifts&quot; brought during the worship.  The lighting was very low with coloured spotlights on the stage, and the names of both Mark Driscoll and Tim Keller got mentioned along with a huge emphasis on &quot;mission&quot; both during the worship, notices and in Terry&#039;s sermons.

There was a brief mention at the end during the benediction by someone (not sure who he was) who said that prayer would be available for those who needed healing or were interested in the gift of tongues while everyone else went for cups of tea.

Personally I found it saddening - seeing as I&#039;ve been at CCK during times when the Presence of God was so weighty that you had to sit down.  The question I found myself pondering was this; In the book of Acts were the church so full of the Presence of God that the surrounding community broke the doors down (metaphorically) to get in?  Or was the emphasis so militantly on getting out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just come back from attending the morning and evening services at Church of Christ the King where Terry Virgo was preaching (his first on his return from Australia) &#8211; I would have to agree Reformissional is the way they seem to be going.</p>
<p>I was quite surprised at the changes in CCK itself since I have last been there.  I think we last went to CCK when Rob Rufus was preaching just before &#8220;TOAM 07&#8243; and the emphasis was very much on the Presence of the Spirit and manifest signs, wonders and miracles.</p>
<p>I noted today that there were no &#8220;contributions&#8221; or &#8220;spiritual gifts&#8221; brought during the worship.  The lighting was very low with coloured spotlights on the stage, and the names of both Mark Driscoll and Tim Keller got mentioned along with a huge emphasis on &#8220;mission&#8221; both during the worship, notices and in Terry&#8217;s sermons.</p>
<p>There was a brief mention at the end during the benediction by someone (not sure who he was) who said that prayer would be available for those who needed healing or were interested in the gift of tongues while everyone else went for cups of tea.</p>
<p>Personally I found it saddening &#8211; seeing as I&#8217;ve been at CCK during times when the Presence of God was so weighty that you had to sit down.  The question I found myself pondering was this; In the book of Acts were the church so full of the Presence of God that the surrounding community broke the doors down (metaphorically) to get in?  Or was the emphasis so militantly on getting out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave bish</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/comment-page-1/#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>dave bish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2009/02/14/newfrontiers-future-directions/#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>As someone who is mostly in the #2 area there this all looks like fair commentary on the influences I see. I&#039;d say that the suspicion has probably not just been of the less charismatic reformed for the charismatic reformed, but also back the other way too. I&#039;m encouraged to see the gap being bridged.

Its useful to note that the best thing about the emerging scene are that they&#039;re asking questions about key areas - addressing those with the right answers has to be a way forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who is mostly in the #2 area there this all looks like fair commentary on the influences I see. I&#8217;d say that the suspicion has probably not just been of the less charismatic reformed for the charismatic reformed, but also back the other way too. I&#8217;m encouraged to see the gap being bridged.</p>
<p>Its useful to note that the best thing about the emerging scene are that they&#8217;re asking questions about key areas &#8211; addressing those with the right answers has to be a way forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

