<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commentary Series Review &#8211; Pillar New Testament Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/</link>
	<description>pursuing faithfulness to the Word of God and fullness of the Spirit of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review&#8211;The Letter of James (Douglas Moo)</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-21365</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review&#8211;The Letter of James (Douglas Moo)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-21365</guid>
		<description>[...] reputation for being one of the finest New Testament commentators, and this volume in the Pillar New Testament Commentary series is no exception to his usual high standard of work. It begins with a thorough introduction, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reputation for being one of the finest New Testament commentators, and this volume in the Pillar New Testament Commentary series is no exception to his usual high standard of work. It begins with a thorough introduction, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; Pillar Commentary on Colossians &#38; Philemon</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-13889</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; Pillar Commentary on Colossians &#38; Philemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-13889</guid>
		<description>[...] Pillar New Testament Commentary series is often described as a mid-level commentary, falling somewhere between popular level expositions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pillar New Testament Commentary series is often described as a mid-level commentary, falling somewhere between popular level expositions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; BEC John (Andreas K&#246;stenberger) &#171; wordandspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-12266</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; BEC John (Andreas K&#246;stenberger) &#171; wordandspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-12266</guid>
		<description>[...] very nice typesetting which sets it apart from series like the Word Biblical Commentary or even the Pillar New Testament Commentary series. It is good to see newer series following suit. The full text of the book is included in blocks at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very nice typesetting which sets it apart from series like the Word Biblical Commentary or even the Pillar New Testament Commentary series. It is good to see newer series following suit. The full text of the book is included in blocks at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; The Gospel According to John (D A Carson) &#171; wordandspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-12138</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; The Gospel According to John (D A Carson) &#171; wordandspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-12138</guid>
		<description>[...] have already blogged about the Pillar New Testament Commentary series, which is itself edited by Don Carson, so you can read my general thoughts on the layout and goals [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have already blogged about the Pillar New Testament Commentary series, which is itself edited by Don Carson, so you can read my general thoughts on the layout and goals [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; The Pillar Commentary on Thessalonians (Gene Green) &#171; wordandspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-12032</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; The Pillar Commentary on Thessalonians (Gene Green) &#171; wordandspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-12032</guid>
		<description>[...] latest addition to the Pillar series of commentaries is reminiscent of O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Pillar Commentary on Ephesians in that it has a long [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latest addition to the Pillar series of commentaries is reminiscent of O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Pillar Commentary on Ephesians in that it has a long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; The Pillar New Testament Commentary on Ephesians (Peter T O&#8217;Brien) &#171; wordandspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-12029</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; The Pillar New Testament Commentary on Ephesians (Peter T O&#8217;Brien) &#171; wordandspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-12029</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Word Biblical Commentary. This work on Ephesians thus completes the set, and although the Pillar Series isn’t as technical as the other series he has written for, this is by no means a basic level [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Word Biblical Commentary. This work on Ephesians thus completes the set, and although the Pillar Series isn’t as technical as the other series he has written for, this is by no means a basic level [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Review &#8211; The Pillar New Testament Commentary on Mark (James R. Edwards) &#171; wordandspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-12028</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review &#8211; The Pillar New Testament Commentary on Mark (James R. Edwards) &#171; wordandspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-12028</guid>
		<description>[...] Pillar commentary series sits in between the devotional and academic styles of commentary. It is evangelical, and designed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pillar commentary series sits in between the devotional and academic styles of commentary. It is evangelical, and designed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark - 

I found your blog by googling &#039;life on wings ern baxter&#039;. Thanks for making it available in MP3 format.

I used to have the audio cassette but lost it years ago. Haven&#039;t heard that masterpiece in over 25 years. It&#039;s still as fresh and relevant today as it was back then. So I&#039;ll be putting it onto my 14-year old son&#039;s MP3 player!

Is it posible to have some of your other Ern Baxter sermons in MP3 format?  Please &#039;mail me as I can&#039;t find an email address for you anywhereon your blog.

Cheers,

- Joel Scott
Hampton, Middx (formerly Minneapolis, Minnesota)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark &#8211; </p>
<p>I found your blog by googling &#8216;life on wings ern baxter&#8217;. Thanks for making it available in MP3 format.</p>
<p>I used to have the audio cassette but lost it years ago. Haven&#8217;t heard that masterpiece in over 25 years. It&#8217;s still as fresh and relevant today as it was back then. So I&#8217;ll be putting it onto my 14-year old son&#8217;s MP3 player!</p>
<p>Is it posible to have some of your other Ern Baxter sermons in MP3 format?  Please &#8216;mail me as I can&#8217;t find an email address for you anywhereon your blog.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>- Joel Scott<br />
Hampton, Middx (formerly Minneapolis, Minnesota)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right on both counts. Moo on James is certainly worthy of the title, I just haven&#039;t heard that many people recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right on both counts. Moo on James is certainly worthy of the title, I just haven&#8217;t heard that many people recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.wordandspirit.co.uk/blog/2005/09/23/commentary-series-review-pillar-new-testament-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markandsteph.plushost.co.uk/blog/?p=120#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I believe the count should be nine, not eight, though Philip E. Hughes on Revelation is no longer in print. It was made a part of this series along with Morris on Romans, Morris on Matthew, and Carson on John when Eerdmans decided to turn these independent commentaries into a series.

I would also add Moo on James as the standard evangelical commentary on that book. The main competitors are the Anchor Bible volume by Luke Timothy Johnson, who is by no means an evangelical, and the NIGTC by Peter Davids, which is a good deal older and not as highly favored by most of the reviews I&#039;ve read. I suppose you could consider Ralph Martin&#039;s WBC, but that&#039;s also older, and Martin is not conservative enough for me to be fully comfortable calling him an an evangelical. He considers himself one, but he doesn&#039;t fit all standards for what the term means. I therefore think of Moo as the evangelical standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the count should be nine, not eight, though Philip E. Hughes on Revelation is no longer in print. It was made a part of this series along with Morris on Romans, Morris on Matthew, and Carson on John when Eerdmans decided to turn these independent commentaries into a series.</p>
<p>I would also add Moo on James as the standard evangelical commentary on that book. The main competitors are the Anchor Bible volume by Luke Timothy Johnson, who is by no means an evangelical, and the NIGTC by Peter Davids, which is a good deal older and not as highly favored by most of the reviews I&#8217;ve read. I suppose you could consider Ralph Martin&#8217;s WBC, but that&#8217;s also older, and Martin is not conservative enough for me to be fully comfortable calling him an an evangelical. He considers himself one, but he doesn&#8217;t fit all standards for what the term means. I therefore think of Moo as the evangelical standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

